You Are the Target Audience (Gulf War I): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''<font face = Papyrus> <font color = maroon> <font size = 4>Primary Source</font></font> </font>''' | |||
''by Arch D. Bunker (Linda Wiens)'' | |||
[[Image:polbhem1$target-audience-arch-d-bunker.jpg]] | [[Image:polbhem1$target-audience-arch-d-bunker.jpg]] | ||
Persian Gulf War: Arch D. Bunker | '''The Arch D. Bunker posters (Persian Gulf War "Target Audience" here), featured over the next few pages, were the work of a loosely affiliated band of San Francisco radicals during the anti-war agitation.''' | ||
''Design: Arch D. Bunker'' | |||
[[Give ??? a Chance (Gulf War 1991) |More Posters-->]] | |||
There are many wars being fought in the Middle East The war of torn and bleeding bodies. The war of Pentagon analysis. The war of media dramatization. Like most Americans, we are privy only to the electronic spectacle of war, safely distanced from the horrific screams and severed limbs. This is the war brought to us by the '''Network News. ''' | There are many wars being fought in the Middle East The war of torn and bleeding bodies. The war of Pentagon analysis. The war of media dramatization. Like most Americans, we are privy only to the electronic spectacle of war, safely distanced from the horrific screams and severed limbs. This is the war brought to us by the '''Network News. ''' | ||
| Line 9: | Line 15: | ||
What we call Network News is really a hybrid of electronic journalism and entertainment. But it is the motive of this broadcast hybrid that concerns us. The news is Big Business and like any other big business, it is involved in alignments of power and influence. So when we see the Gulf War reported and dramatized, we must wonder: What's at stake here? And: Whose interests are being served? After all, broadcast journalists are not civil servants, they are highly-paid emcees for corporate history. Next time you watch the coverage of the Gulf War, think about this: | What we call Network News is really a hybrid of electronic journalism and entertainment. But it is the motive of this broadcast hybrid that concerns us. The news is Big Business and like any other big business, it is involved in alignments of power and influence. So when we see the Gulf War reported and dramatized, we must wonder: What's at stake here? And: Whose interests are being served? After all, broadcast journalists are not civil servants, they are highly-paid emcees for corporate history. Next time you watch the coverage of the Gulf War, think about this: | ||
<font size=4>The Shared Conspiracy</font> | |||
When you watch the News, you are invited to enter into a pact. You are expected to believe in the same system, share the same values and goals. The broadcasters promise to reinforce your beliefs, if you promise to rely on them. Under the terms of this pact the News pretends to press the government for answers. | When you watch the News, you are invited to enter into a pact. You are expected to believe in the same system, share the same values and goals. The broadcasters promise to reinforce your beliefs, if you promise to rely on them. Under the terms of this pact the News pretends to press the government for answers. | ||
<font size=4>Emptying Language</font> | |||
"Surgical Strike," "Collateral Damage," "Carpet Bombing," "Friendly Fire": The TV viewer is fed the new vocabulary of war. Familiar catch phrases--their meaning depleted by repetition--make reports of war palatable, and insure audience retention. These vacant terms only masquerade as information. The frightening reality is replaced by a lullaby of empty cliches. | "Surgical Strike," "Collateral Damage," "Carpet Bombing," "Friendly Fire": The TV viewer is fed the new vocabulary of war. Familiar catch phrases--their meaning depleted by repetition--make reports of war palatable, and insure audience retention. These vacant terms only masquerade as information. The frightening reality is replaced by a lullaby of empty cliches. | ||
<font size=4>Picture This</font> | |||
Using selected images, TV News pretends to transport you to the heart of the action, creating the dizzy sensation that you can be anywhere, informed and powerful, an active player in global politics--while you 're sitting at home safe and going nowhere. | Using selected images, TV News pretends to transport you to the heart of the action, creating the dizzy sensation that you can be anywhere, informed and powerful, an active player in global politics--while you 're sitting at home safe and going nowhere. | ||
<font size=4>More Is Less</font> | |||
The cheapest version of reality is the one that relies on charts and maps. It presents knowledge not as understanding, but as volume. Under the gaze of the News, quantity vanquishes quality. Because quality attests to the presence of surprise, of emotion, of suffering. To protect us from the unpredictable, the News delivers war as a factor of inventory depleted. But where there are only numbers, there is no quality of life. | The cheapest version of reality is the one that relies on charts and maps. It presents knowledge not as understanding, but as volume. Under the gaze of the News, quantity vanquishes quality. Because quality attests to the presence of surprise, of emotion, of suffering. To protect us from the unpredictable, the News delivers war as a factor of inventory depleted. But where there are only numbers, there is no quality of life. | ||
<font size=4>The Pollsters</font> | |||
By second-guessing public opinion, broadcasters can tailor-fit the news to taste. What better way to see the world than as a reflection of your own views. But polls measure something other than opinion--they measure the degree to which the public has forfeited its democratic participation. | By second-guessing public opinion, broadcasters can tailor-fit the news to taste. What better way to see the world than as a reflection of your own views. But polls measure something other than opinion--they measure the degree to which the public has forfeited its democratic participation. | ||
<font size=4>When the Generals Talk</font> | |||
Parading out the experts is a two-fold diversion. Initiation into the technical details of a specialty, in this case warfare, is a method of producing a false sense of privilege. It is also a way of masking the absence of real news. Generals (ret.) command a rhetorical skill that quickly fills dead air time--it's known as generalization. | Parading out the experts is a two-fold diversion. Initiation into the technical details of a specialty, in this case warfare, is a method of producing a false sense of privilege. It is also a way of masking the absence of real news. Generals (ret.) command a rhetorical skill that quickly fills dead air time--it's known as generalization. | ||
<font size=4>Them and Us</font> | |||
Like any theatrical presentation, the news thrives on conflict. Often the News will help the process along, stirring controversy, fabricating hostility. Pinpointing the enemy, the Them against Us, is basic to this drama. The enemy can be an oil spill, an Iraqi civilian, an anti-war activist anything that generates tension. Only the News and its vested interests are above suspicion. | Like any theatrical presentation, the news thrives on conflict. Often the News will help the process along, stirring controversy, fabricating hostility. Pinpointing the enemy, the Them against Us, is basic to this drama. The enemy can be an oil spill, an Iraqi civilian, an anti-war activist anything that generates tension. Only the News and its vested interests are above suspicion. | ||
<font size=4>Auto-Analysis</font> | |||
To protect itself from criticism, the News indulges in its own analysis, admitting the small error to hide the greater sin. The News might publicly examine the fact that it airs only Pentagon-approved footage, or offer a forum about its own frustration with censorship. The military calls this a preemptive strike. | To protect itself from criticism, the News indulges in its own analysis, admitting the small error to hide the greater sin. The News might publicly examine the fact that it airs only Pentagon-approved footage, or offer a forum about its own frustration with censorship. The military calls this a preemptive strike. | ||
<hr> | |||
[[Image:Foundsf-anti-war-icon.gif|link=Give ??? a Chance]] [[Give ??? a Chance| Continue Anti-War Tour]] | |||
[[Gulf War demos |Prev. Document]] [[ | [[Gulf War demos |Prev. Document]] [[Give ??? a Chance (Gulf War 1991) |Next Document]] | ||
[[category:Dissent]] [[category:1990s]] [[category:military]] | [[category:Dissent]] [[category:1990s]] [[category:military]] [[category:anti-war]] | ||
Latest revision as of 16:00, 6 August 2014
Primary Source
by Arch D. Bunker (Linda Wiens)
The Arch D. Bunker posters (Persian Gulf War "Target Audience" here), featured over the next few pages, were the work of a loosely affiliated band of San Francisco radicals during the anti-war agitation.
Design: Arch D. Bunker
There are many wars being fought in the Middle East The war of torn and bleeding bodies. The war of Pentagon analysis. The war of media dramatization. Like most Americans, we are privy only to the electronic spectacle of war, safely distanced from the horrific screams and severed limbs. This is the war brought to us by the Network News.
What we call Network News is really a hybrid of electronic journalism and entertainment. But it is the motive of this broadcast hybrid that concerns us. The news is Big Business and like any other big business, it is involved in alignments of power and influence. So when we see the Gulf War reported and dramatized, we must wonder: What's at stake here? And: Whose interests are being served? After all, broadcast journalists are not civil servants, they are highly-paid emcees for corporate history. Next time you watch the coverage of the Gulf War, think about this:
The Shared Conspiracy
When you watch the News, you are invited to enter into a pact. You are expected to believe in the same system, share the same values and goals. The broadcasters promise to reinforce your beliefs, if you promise to rely on them. Under the terms of this pact the News pretends to press the government for answers.
Emptying Language
"Surgical Strike," "Collateral Damage," "Carpet Bombing," "Friendly Fire": The TV viewer is fed the new vocabulary of war. Familiar catch phrases--their meaning depleted by repetition--make reports of war palatable, and insure audience retention. These vacant terms only masquerade as information. The frightening reality is replaced by a lullaby of empty cliches.
Picture This
Using selected images, TV News pretends to transport you to the heart of the action, creating the dizzy sensation that you can be anywhere, informed and powerful, an active player in global politics--while you 're sitting at home safe and going nowhere.
More Is Less
The cheapest version of reality is the one that relies on charts and maps. It presents knowledge not as understanding, but as volume. Under the gaze of the News, quantity vanquishes quality. Because quality attests to the presence of surprise, of emotion, of suffering. To protect us from the unpredictable, the News delivers war as a factor of inventory depleted. But where there are only numbers, there is no quality of life.
The Pollsters
By second-guessing public opinion, broadcasters can tailor-fit the news to taste. What better way to see the world than as a reflection of your own views. But polls measure something other than opinion--they measure the degree to which the public has forfeited its democratic participation.
When the Generals Talk
Parading out the experts is a two-fold diversion. Initiation into the technical details of a specialty, in this case warfare, is a method of producing a false sense of privilege. It is also a way of masking the absence of real news. Generals (ret.) command a rhetorical skill that quickly fills dead air time--it's known as generalization.
Them and Us
Like any theatrical presentation, the news thrives on conflict. Often the News will help the process along, stirring controversy, fabricating hostility. Pinpointing the enemy, the Them against Us, is basic to this drama. The enemy can be an oil spill, an Iraqi civilian, an anti-war activist anything that generates tension. Only the News and its vested interests are above suspicion.
Auto-Analysis
To protect itself from criticism, the News indulges in its own analysis, admitting the small error to hide the greater sin. The News might publicly examine the fact that it airs only Pentagon-approved footage, or offer a forum about its own frustration with censorship. The military calls this a preemptive strike.
