The Call Advocates Women's Suffrage: Difference between revisions
(Created new page) |
(Added Photo Credits) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
[[image:callsupport.jpg]] | [[image:callsupport.jpg]] | ||
''Image | ''Image: The Bancroft Library, Berkeley, California'' | ||
John D. Spreckels, the eldest son of the famous sugar millionaire Claus Spreckels, was the editor of The Call, which not only advocated women’s suffrage, but provided a worthy historical trail of the activities of the women’s suffrage campaign of 1911. The Call distinguished itself as distinctly separate from the liquor establishment in San Francisco when it declared its aggressive support for suffrage on the front page of the Sunday edition, August 6, 1911. | John D. Spreckels, the eldest son of the famous sugar millionaire Claus Spreckels, was the editor of The Call, which not only advocated women’s suffrage, but provided a worthy historical trail of the activities of the women’s suffrage campaign of 1911. The Call distinguished itself as distinctly separate from the liquor establishment in San Francisco when it declared its aggressive support for suffrage on the front page of the Sunday edition, August 6, 1911. | ||
| Line 14: | Line 13: | ||
'''When The Call could have asked its colleagues to "eat crow."''' | '''When The Call could have asked its colleagues to "eat crow."''' | ||
''Image: The Bancroft Library, Berkeley, California'' | |||
After the October 10, 1911 election, when both leading San Francisco papers, the Examiner and Chronicle, declared suffrage dead again, The Call reminded everybody that all the votes were not yet counted. Actually, The Call predicted that suffrage would win by 4,000 votes! The final margin was 3,587. In this article, The Call pointed out how the rest of the San Francisco papers were wrong and only it was right. So it was. Good reporting. | After the October 10, 1911 election, when both leading San Francisco papers, the Examiner and Chronicle, declared suffrage dead again, The Call reminded everybody that all the votes were not yet counted. Actually, The Call predicted that suffrage would win by 4,000 votes! The final margin was 3,587. In this article, The Call pointed out how the rest of the San Francisco papers were wrong and only it was right. So it was. Good reporting. | ||
Revision as of 15:36, 30 June 2014
Historical Essay
By Mae Silver, excerpted from The Sixth Star
Image: The Bancroft Library, Berkeley, California
John D. Spreckels, the eldest son of the famous sugar millionaire Claus Spreckels, was the editor of The Call, which not only advocated women’s suffrage, but provided a worthy historical trail of the activities of the women’s suffrage campaign of 1911. The Call distinguished itself as distinctly separate from the liquor establishment in San Francisco when it declared its aggressive support for suffrage on the front page of the Sunday edition, August 6, 1911.
When The Call could have asked its colleagues to "eat crow." Image: The Bancroft Library, Berkeley, California
After the October 10, 1911 election, when both leading San Francisco papers, the Examiner and Chronicle, declared suffrage dead again, The Call reminded everybody that all the votes were not yet counted. Actually, The Call predicted that suffrage would win by 4,000 votes! The final margin was 3,587. In this article, The Call pointed out how the rest of the San Francisco papers were wrong and only it was right. So it was. Good reporting.